Talk:Mechanics - Revision history

Gammaton32 at 18:17, 19 May 2026

2026-05-19T18:17:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 19 May 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:

	'''FakerofDeadlock''': Igor is right. Should we move all the info in the sections to the Strategy page? Avoiding repeated information, of course. Then just lay things out similar to the DOTA wiki's mechanics page.		'''FakerofDeadlock''': Igor is right. Should we move all the info in the sections to the Strategy page? Avoiding repeated information, of course. Then just lay things out similar to the DOTA wiki's mechanics page.



	== Proposed Redesign ==		== Proposed Redesign ==
Line 27:		Line 25:
	== Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC) ==		== Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC) ==

	{{Feedback\|feedback=make [[Gameplay]] redirect to this\|user=~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212}}		{{Feedback\|feedback=make [[Gameplay]] redirect to this\|user=~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212\|resolved=true}}

~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212: /* Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC) */

2026-05-19T17:45:52Z

Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 19 May 2026
Line 27:		Line 27:
	== Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC) ==		== Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC) ==

	{{Feedback\|feedback=make ~~[[~~Gameplay~~]]~~ redirect to this\|user=~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212}}		{{Feedback\|feedback=make [[Gameplay]] redirect to this\|user=~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212}}

~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212: New feedback submitted

2026-05-19T17:45:18Z

New feedback submitted

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:45, 19 May 2026
Line 24:		Line 24:

	[[souls]], [[items]], [[shop]]		[[souls]], [[items]], [[shop]]

			== Feedback (Tue, 19 May 2026 17:45:17 UTC) ==

			{{Feedback\|feedback=make [[Gameplay]] redirect to this\|user=~2026-IvySoulsEscalating212}}

FakerofDeadlock at 00:34, 17 September 2024

2024-09-17T00:34:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:34, 17 September 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''FakerofDeadlock''': Will have to add out-of-site hyperlinks to the first mention of macros and micros, probably to Wikipedia.		'''FakerofDeadlock''': Will have to add out-of-site hyperlinks to the first mention of macros and micros, probably to Wikipedia. (Obsolete)

	'''Shatangmi''': I think that the more strategy-related topics like uptime and team composition should be moved to the strategy page. The mechanics page should include "objective" (for lack of a better word) information that is explicitly included in the game. Like stats, map timings, souls, etc. I'm just concerned that the more strategy-related topics could be seen as subjective or debatable.		'''Shatangmi''': I think that the more strategy-related topics like uptime and team composition should be moved to the strategy page. The mechanics page should include "objective" (for lack of a better word) information that is explicitly included in the game. Like stats, map timings, souls, etc. I'm just concerned that the more strategy-related topics could be seen as subjective or debatable.
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I agree with Igor. --[[User:StrangeThing\|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing\|talk]]) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)		I agree with Igor. --[[User:StrangeThing\|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing\|talk]]) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

			'''FakerofDeadlock''': Igor is right. Should we move all the info in the sections to the Strategy page? Avoiding repeated information, of course. Then just lay things out similar to the DOTA wiki's mechanics page.



	== Proposed Redesign ==		== Proposed Redesign ==

StrangeThing: /* Proposed Redesign */

2024-09-15T01:32:03Z

Proposed Redesign

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:32, 15 September 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== Proposed Redesign ==		== Proposed Redesign ==

	It's mostly links to other pages, that go in depth on specifics.		It's mostly links to other pages, that go in depth on specifics. --[[User:StrangeThing\|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing\|talk]]) 01:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

	[[stats]]		[[stats]]

99.122.193.199: Proposed Redesign

2024-09-15T01:31:34Z

Proposed Redesign

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 15 September 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	'''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics		'''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics
	~~Agreed~~. --[[User:StrangeThing\|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing\|talk]]) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
			I agree with Igor. --[[User:StrangeThing\|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing\|talk]]) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

			== Proposed Redesign ==

			It's mostly links to other pages, that go in depth on specifics.

			[[stats]]

			[[level]], [[ammo]], [[health]], [[Damage Shield]], [[Damage Resistance]], [[spirit power]], [[stamina]]

			[[Status Effects]]

			[[map]], [[ziplines]]

			[[souls]], [[items]], [[shop]]

StrangeThing at 19:10, 5 September 2024

2024-09-05T19:10:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 5 September 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	'''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics		'''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics
			Agreed. --[[User:StrangeThing\|StrangeThing]] ([[User talk:StrangeThing\|talk]]) 19:10, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Igor at 18:17, 4 September 2024

2024-09-04T18:17:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 4 September 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	'''Shatangmi''': I think that the more strategy-related topics like uptime and team composition should be moved to the strategy page. The mechanics page should include "objective" (for lack of a better word) information that is explicitly included in the game. Like stats, map timings, souls, etc. I'm just concerned that the more strategy-related topics could be seen as subjective or debatable.		'''Shatangmi''': I think that the more strategy-related topics like uptime and team composition should be moved to the strategy page. The mechanics page should include "objective" (for lack of a better word) information that is explicitly included in the game. Like stats, map timings, souls, etc. I'm just concerned that the more strategy-related topics could be seen as subjective or debatable.

			'''Igor''': Macro and micro concepts have no place in a mechanics page, they should be in the strategy one. The Dota 2 wiki has an excellent mechanics page that could be used as reference https://liquipedia.net/dota2/Mechanics

Shatangmi at 11:48, 3 September 2024

2024-09-03T11:48:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 3 September 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''FakerofDeadlock''': Will have to add out-of-site hyperlinks to the first mention of macros and micros, probably to Wikipedia.		'''FakerofDeadlock''': Will have to add out-of-site hyperlinks to the first mention of macros and micros, probably to Wikipedia.

			'''Shatangmi''': I think that the more strategy-related topics like uptime and team composition should be moved to the strategy page. The mechanics page should include "objective" (for lack of a better word) information that is explicitly included in the game. Like stats, map timings, souls, etc. I'm just concerned that the more strategy-related topics could be seen as subjective or debatable.

FakerofDeadlock at 08:09, 27 August 2024

2024-08-27T08:09:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:09, 27 August 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''FakerofDeadlock''': ~~The headings for~~ micros ~~and macros may be better handled as subheadings~~.		'''FakerofDeadlock''': Will have to add out-of-site hyperlinks to the first mention of macros and micros, probably to Wikipedia.