Talk:Pocket - Revision history

Gammaton32 at 20:26, 31 August 2026

2026-08-31T20:26:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:26, 31 August 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:

	--[[User:MinaFan13\|MinaFan13]] ([[User talk:MinaFan13\|talk]]) 20:04, 31 August 2026 (UTC)		--[[User:MinaFan13\|MinaFan13]] ([[User talk:MinaFan13\|talk]]) 20:04, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

			Ok, first example makes sense in the context of the newspaper, though it could be argued that it uses a gender neutral descriptor for a reason. Examples 2-4 could have used gendered pronouns just as well. Same for 5-6, I can't speak specifically on Japanese grammar but Yamato does use gendered pronouns when speaking of other characters (and I mean specifically in the official subtitles in the game files, which - though I can't say I'm familiar with Valve's writing process - I can only presume are the lines as originally written in English). --[[User:Gammaton32\|Gammaton32]] ([[User talk:Gammaton32\|talk]]) 20:26, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

MinaFan13 at 20:06, 31 August 2026

2026-08-31T20:06:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 31 August 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	"The child was out of their depth." -"the child" is the subject of the sentence, making "their" more natural to use.		"The child was out of their depth." -"the child" is the subject of the sentence, making "their" more natural to use.

			"So the heir to Fairfax Industries has graced us with their presence" -same here, "heir" is the subject of the sentence.

	"I don't even wanna know what they got in that case." -he/she wouldnt work here, even a gendered person would have they used to make the sentence flow better		"I don't even wanna know what they got in that case." -he/she wouldnt work here, even a gendered person would have they used to make the sentence flow better

MinaFan13: /* Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) */

2026-08-31T20:05:13Z

Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 31 August 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:

	The citations are based on the [https://deltarune.wiki/w/Kris Deltarune Wiki], it's a harmless wiki gag that is often appreciated and mentioned by our users, so we prefer to keep it that way. --[[User:Gammaton32\|Gammaton32]] ([[User talk:Gammaton32\|talk]]) 14:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)		The citations are based on the [https://deltarune.wiki/w/Kris Deltarune Wiki], it's a harmless wiki gag that is often appreciated and mentioned by our users, so we prefer to keep it that way. --[[User:Gammaton32\|Gammaton32]] ([[User talk:Gammaton32\|talk]]) 14:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

			Regardless of the joke, a lot of the quotes are unreliable as citations and their inclusion actively diminishes the point of having references in the section.

			"A street urchin in a Santa hat is making waves, as they spread holiday cheer throughout New York" -this is a newspaper referring to an anonymous person, gendered pronouns wouldn't be used

			"The child was out of their depth." -"the child" is the subject of the sentence, making "their" more natural to use.

			"I don't even wanna know what they got in that case." -he/she wouldnt work here, even a gendered person would have they used to make the sentence flow better

			"They were young and stupid"/"They need to let go of the past" (from Yamato in Japanese) - Japanese typically doesn't use pronouns, in the first, Yamato is just calling them a stupid person, and in the second, the subject is omitted.

			--[[User:MinaFan13\|MinaFan13]] ([[User talk:MinaFan13\|talk]]) 20:04, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Gammaton32: /* Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) */

2026-07-20T14:47:00Z

Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==		== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==

	{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, the citing by itself is perfectly fine but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations especially as of now 20? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place considering people misgendering them, but it can also be easily all densed into a sub page ([[Pocket/Pronouns]]?) explaining why they are using they/them by lisitng all the quotes in one list and then link the page as the citation.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=~~false~~}}		{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, the citing by itself is perfectly fine but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations especially as of now 20? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place considering people misgendering them, but it can also be easily all densed into a sub page ([[Pocket/Pronouns]]?) explaining why they are using they/them by lisitng all the quotes in one list and then link the page as the citation.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=true}}

			The citations are based on the [https://deltarune.wiki/w/Kris Deltarune Wiki], it's a harmless wiki gag that is often appreciated and mentioned by our users, so we prefer to keep it that way. --[[User:Gammaton32\|Gammaton32]] ([[User talk:Gammaton32\|talk]]) 14:46, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

~2026-SilencerHeroicDivine706: /* Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) */Clarification and improving text

2026-07-20T14:32:46Z

Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC): Clarification and improving text

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==		== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==

	{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, ~~I am perfectly ok with~~ the citing but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place, but it can also be easily all densed into ~~maybe~~ a sub page explaining why they are using they/them~~. Lisitng~~ all quotes in one list and then link the page.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=false}}		{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, the citing by itself is perfectly fine but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations especially as of now 20? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place considering people misgendering them, but it can also be easily all densed into a sub page ([[Pocket/Pronouns]]?) explaining why they are using they/them by lisitng all the quotes in one list and then link the page as the citation.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=false}}

~2026-SilencerHeroicDivine706: /* Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) */

2026-07-20T14:25:41Z

Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==		== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==

	{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, I am perfectly ok with the citing but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place, but it can also be easily all densed into maybe a sub page explaining why they are using they/them.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=false}}		{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, I am perfectly ok with the citing but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place, but it can also be easily all densed into maybe a sub page explaining why they are using they/them. Lisitng all quotes in one list and then link the page.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=false}}

~2026-SilencerHeroicDivine706: New feedback submitted

2026-07-20T14:19:53Z

New feedback submitted

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:19, 20 July 2026
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== Feedback (Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:52 UTC) ==

		{{Feedback\|feedback=Excessive sourcing on they/them, I am perfectly ok with the citing but I think it might be rather unprofessional to add a lot of citations? Don't take this in negative light as I think it has a place, but it can also be easily all densed into maybe a sub page explaining why they are using they/them.\|user=Anonymous\|resolved=false}}

Gammaton32: Blanked the page

2026-06-16T04:06:29Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 16 June 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Feedback (Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:05:10 UTC) ==~~

	~~{{Feedback\|feedback=this is a test\|user=Gammaton32}}~~

Gammaton32: New feedback submitted

2026-06-16T04:05:11Z

New feedback submitted

New page

== Feedback (Tue, 16 Jun 2026 04:05:10 UTC) ==

{{Feedback|feedback=this is a test|user=Gammaton32}}